字幕原文 · CC BY 3.0

Keynote Panel Discussion: Revolutionizing Cloud Native Architectures with WebAssembly

A cloud-native panel compares virtual machines, containers and WebAssembly, explaining SpinKube and running Wasm applications on Kubernetes.

CNCF [Cloud Native Computing Foundation] · Published · 16 min · English · License: CC BY 3.0 · Source: 在 YouTube 觀看

字幕來源:Vidleaf 自動語音辨識,可能有誤。Vidleaf 加入 AI 標點,保留原字詞與時間戳。下方可查看原始字幕。

AI 生成摘要

The talk uses boxing weight classes as a metaphor for cloud runtimes: virtual machines are the heavyweight class that can do a lot but often take minutes to start, containers are the middleweight class that start in seconds and suit a single long-running server, and WebAssembly is the lightweight class, compiled once and reused across architectures and operating systems, with a cold start of about half a millisecond. SpinKube helps run WebAssembly on Kubernetes: a SpinApp custom resource references an OCI artifact containing a WebAssembly binary, and a Spin operator deploys the corresponding pod and service, with the pod using a Wasm runtime instead of a container runtime. On a two-node AKS cluster, increasing replicas to 50 distributes pods across an x86 node and an Ampere ARM64-based node. Kai from Zeiss describes looking into WebAssembly in the cloud to bring semantic and technical granularity closer together; a demo shows three Spin apps scaling with regular Kubernetes primitives, and replacing a regular deployment with a Spin app with a WebAssembly artifact reduces a Node.js Express app from 400 megs to almost 2 megs. Switching from x86 to ARM alone reduced cost by 60%. Built on RunWazi, the WebAssembly ContainerD shim for Spin lets Kubernetes scale quickly and move workloads across operating systems and CPUs without multi-arch builds, and WebAssembly workloads can run in the same pod as containers. Fermion, Microsoft, SUSE, and Liquid Reply announce SpinKube, an open source stack that includes a runtime class manager and the Spin operator, and they have submitted the application to contribute SpinCube to the CNCF.

根據字幕生成。請透過連結對照原影片核對。

附時間戳的章節摘要

Boxing Weight Classes and Cloud Computing

  • [0:00] The speaker has recently gotten into boxing but mostly just watches from the couch.
  • [0:09] Boxing has weight classes like heavyweight, middleweight, and lightweight, and a boxer must meet a certain weight to box within a class.
  • [0:30] These weight classes remind the speaker of the clouds of cloud computing.
  • [0:36] Virtual machines are the heavyweight class: powerful, but slow to get back up if knocked down.
  • [0:54] Virtual machines are the OG heavyweight runtime for the Cloud and often take minutes to start.
  • [1:02] Virtual machines contain an entire operating system from kernel to applications, so you can do a lot with them.

Containers vs WebAssembly in Cloud

  • [1:10] A container is lighter and smaller, positioned as the middleweight class in cloud computing.
  • [1:19] Middleweight strikes a balance between speed and power.
  • [1:23] Containers provide a suitable environment for running a single long-running server.
  • [1:30] Containers start in seconds rather than minutes and consume fewer resources than virtual machines.
  • [1:39] WebAssembly is described as the third wave of cloud computing and the lightweight class, where speed and agility matter most.
  • [1:39] An app can be compiled once directly to the WebAssembly binary format and reused unchanged across multiple architectures and operating systems.
  • [2:01] A WebAssembly app can be cold started in about half a millisecond.
  • [2:09] That half-millisecond startup makes WebAssembly vastly faster to start than even containers.

Running WebAssembly on Kubernetes with SpinKube

  • [2:30] SpinKube is a project that helps run WebAssembly on Kubernetes and in cloud-native environments.
  • [2:36] A SpinApp custom resource in Kubernetes references an OCI artifact containing a WebAssembly binary.
  • [2:57] A Spin operator runs behind the SpinApp custom resource.
  • [3:11] The Spin operator picks up the applied SpinApp and deploys the corresponding deployment pod and service.
  • [3:18] The pod is configured to use a Wasm runtime instead of a container runtime to execute the app.
  • [3:25] Externally there are still pods and services as usual, but internally they are WebAssembly apps, not containers.
  • [3:35] Increasing the replica count to 50 on a two-node AKS cluster distributes pods across an x86 node and an Ampere ARM64-based node.
  • [3:59] To scale further, the same binary can be placed on any burstable instance that is cheap at that time.
  • [4:12] These kinds of things have been important to the team at Zeiss Group.

WebAssembly for Faster, Smaller Cloud Services

  • [4:24] Kai from Zeiss says the company works with spheres, lenses and optics, from microscopes to high-NA lithography systems used to produce Apple silicon or NVIDIA GPUs.
  • [5:18] Many of their business models require processing information electronically, whether for the sheer scale of information or attached product specifications.
  • [5:36] At project start money is not the issue; project risks are high and commitments are made, and they add CNCF tools like DAP or KEDA.
  • [5:55] Once the business settles, finance requires a more design-for-cost approach.
  • [6:08] Services are initially designed within bounded contexts using domain-driven design, but later logistic aspects like container runtime sizes and part limitations force technical granularity to diverge from semantic granularity.
  • [6:32] They started looking into WebAssembly in the cloud to bring semantic and technical granularity closer together.
  • [7:34] A demo shows three Spin apps handling load with regular Kubernetes primitives, scaling replicas up as orders arrive and throughput increasing.
  • [8:26] The whole throughput ends up around 34 seconds, which Kai calls pretty darn good compared with other environments.
  • [8:47] Using a Spin app with a WebAssembly artifact instead of a regular deployment reduces a Node.js Express app from 400 megs to almost 2 megs, and adding more logic will not dramatically increase that size.
  • [9:06] The small size lets services scale up and down fast, so the same resources can be reused with slight overlap by later waves of processing while still using known tools and environments.
  • [9:42] Smaller packaging allows packing more services into the same resources or using cheaper resources, with faster scaling and higher resource reusability.
  • [10:09] Switching from x86 to ARM alone reduced cost by 60%, allowing 60% cheaper resources.

SpinKube: WebAssembly workloads on Kubernetes

  • [10:28] Kai's demo results from open source projects in Go and Rust, backed by the CNCF and Bytecode Alliance foundations worldwide.
  • [10:55] Kubernetes is the first project highlighted; WebAssembly work still relies on Kubernetes.
  • [11:04] Kubernetes' maturity and stability as a platform enables continued innovation around it.
  • [11:12] The CNCF's ContainerD project has many shims for integrating different workload kinds into Kubernetes.
  • [11:23] Microsoft created the Rust-based ContainerD project, used by contributors including Fermion, Docker, and Second State to add flexibility and scaling agility to Kubernetes without affecting existing containers.
  • [11:56] Built on RunWazi, the WebAssembly ContainerD shim for Spin lets Kubernetes scale quickly and move workloads across operating systems and CPUs on the fly without multi-arch builds.
  • [12:19] WebAssembly workloads can run in the same pod as containers, so existing container workloads keep working.
  • [12:30] The KWASM operator from Liquid Reply installs the SpinShim easily without requiring a new cluster or bootstrapping.
  • [13:14] Fermion, Microsoft, SUSE, and Liquid Reply announce SpinKube, an open source stack to streamline developing, deploying, and operating WebAssembly workloads on Kubernetes alongside containers.
  • [13:32] SpinKube includes a runtime class manager handling installation, upgrade, and uninstallation of ContainerD shims such as RunWazi-based shims.
  • [14:01] The Spin operator optimizes workloads for density and scaling agility, as Zeiss was doing.

SpinCube Submitted to CNCF

  • [14:36] They have submitted the application to contribute SpinCube to the CNCF.
  • [14:44] Many in the cloud native community have been excited about WebAssembly over the last several years.
  • [15:00] They hope people join the endeavor to make WebAssembly's power more accessible and leverageable.
  • [15:23] More information is available at the Microsoft booth and the Fermion booth, and there is a talk later today at 2.30 in S3, SO6.

[0:00] So I've recently gotten into boxing. I don't actually box. I mostly just watch from the comfort of my couch. And in boxing, there are weight classes like heavyweight, middleweight, lightweight, and so on. And it's exactly how it sounds. A boxer must meet a certain weight to box within a class. And these weight classes, Remind me of the clouds of the waves of cloud computing.

[0:35] Thank you. So first up, you've got your virtual machines. This is your heavyweight class. Being in the heavyweight class in boxing means you are powerful. But if you get knocked down, it's going to take some time for you to get back up. That's basic physics, right? Virtual machines are the OG heavyweight runtime for the Cloud. Often, they take minutes to start, But they contain an entire operating system from kernel to applications, so you can do a lot with them.

[1:10] A container is lighter and smaller. And in the world of Cloud Computing, this would be your middleweight class. Middleweight strikes a balance between speed and power. containers have given us the perfect environment for running a single long-running server. They take seconds, not minutes, to start, and consume fewer resources than virtual machines. Now, add to that WebAssembly, the third wave of Cloud computing. This is your lightweight class. Speed and agility is the name of the game here. Compile your app once directly to the WebAssembly binary format, and use that same binary across multiple architectures and operating systems with no changes.

[2:01] And a WebAssembly app can be cold started in about half a millisecond. half a millisecond, making it vastly faster than even-- making its startup speed vastly faster than even containers. So how do we run WebAssembly on Kubernetes and in cloud-native environments? I'm going to talk to you about Spin Cube today, which is a project that helps you do just that.

[2:36] So this is a SpinApp custom resource in Kubernetes. Online 6 is a reference to an OCI artifact containing... A WebAssembly binary. Yeah, that's a thing you can do. Behind this SpinApp custom resource lives a spin operator. Once I apply my spin app to my cluster, we're going to see it running in our cluster here.

[3:11] The spin app, the spin operator will actually pick it up and deploy the corresponding deployment pod and service. It's configuring the pod to use a Wasm runtime instead of a container runtime to execute our app. So on the outside, you still have your pods and services, same as usual, but on the inside, they're actually WebAssembly apps, not containers. This is that same app. We're going to increase the replica account to 50, and apply it to our cluster.

[3:43] I'm running on a two node AKS cluster here. And if I check out my pods, they're being distributed, look closely on my two nodes. One is an x86 node and the other is Ampere's ARM64 base node. Thank you. And if I want to scale even further, then I can just throw that same binary on Any burstable incense, that's cheap for me at that time. Thank you. These are the kinds of things that have been important to the team over at Zeiss Group.

[4:18] And I'd like to invite Kai now to talk to us about their experience in this space. Thank you, Kai. Merci, Michel. So coming from size, I can relate to physics. As the ARC in our logo suggests, we handle with spheres, lenses, optics. From microscopes up to this bulk cube like looking clunks of metal, which are high NA lithocatheter systems, which you basically need to produce your beloved Apple silicon or NVIDIA GPUs. These are the only optic devices on the whole planet which can do that.

[4:58] So my R&D experts, they always try to explain this kind of optics to me, but there's no help there, so I can only grasp the basics of it. But what I understand is how to operate such business models on information technology. Many of our business models require that we process the information electronically, be it just for the pure scale of information we have to process or the product specifications which are attached.

[5:34] Oh. So in the beginning, money is not the issue when we start such projects. We The project risks are high, the commitments are made, And we basically recouponated the hell out of that case. Even rubbed some CNCF goodness on it like DAP or KEDA, whatever. As soon as the dust and the business settles, our finance folks catch up with us, which then requires us to basically go into more design for cost approach.

[6:06] Secondly, Often in the beginning, we are capable to have the luxury of designing those services Within bounded contexts, applying domain-driven design So really doing nice systems. Further down the road, often logistic aspects kick in, like container runtime sizes, number of parts limitations, whatever. And soon we are forced to give in basically that the technical granularity of what we run diverges from the semantic granularity. And this is one of the points why we started looking into WebAssembly in the cloud, basically to get those two closer together, the semantic and technical granularity.

[6:58] For that, we generalize one of our many flows, which reflects how we usually do that processing. That means we get a number of messages or orders dropped at our doorstep, and then the expectation is that these messages, they are processed in a given time. answering, okay, when, how we produce or deliver that thing. And this is exactly what we measure. from the arrival of the orders to until they are landing in some buckets.

[7:30] Now let's see that in action. Bye. So what we see here are these three spin apps which had handled the load and their respective deployments. So you see quite regular Kubernetes primitives. Let's generate some load. You see the basic shape of replicas. The load picks up. The first set of replicas already takes in the first chunk of orders. And as soon as the environment is scaling up, the number of orders that can be processed in the same time slice increases dramatically. First, some distributor functions picks the orders, does some basic decisions, and then hands it over over queues to a second wave of services, which basically put it in buckets to some other decisions.

[8:20] What we can see here is how fast the services are scaling up and picking up the traffic. Thank you. In the end, the whole throughput will be around 34 seconds, which if you follow other posts I did with other environments, is pretty darn good. So in the end it's just physics. By using a spin app with WebAssembly artifact instead of a regular deployment, we can for such a Node.js Express app, we can reduce the size from 400 megs to almost 2 megs.

[8:57] So even if we would add more logic, that size will not dramatically increase. And that allows that the... that the scale goes up fast and scales down also as fast, which then on the other hand allows that the same resources with a slight overlap can be reused already by the second or third or fourth wave, whatever wave of processing you have. So we can use the same resources multiple times within such a process.

[9:29] And that's by still applying all the tools, all the environments we already know. Yeah. Again, to conclude, The smaller packaging size allows that we pack more services into the same resources, or on the other hand use cheaper resources to process the same posture of services. We can scale up down faster, have a higher grade of reusability of the same resources.

[10:02] while keeping the the the tools we know. Here again in numbers, even when switching from just from x86 to ARM, we could reduce with 60%, so we could use 60% cheaper resources for that. And with that, I want to hand over to my brother in hair color, Ralph. Thank you. What you've just seen and heard from Kai is a result of a collection of open source projects in both Go and also Rust and open source foundations, obviously the CNCF and also the Bytecode Alliance Foundation across the entire world in collaboration. And I want to highlight just some of the important projects that you're probably familiar with that actually make this kind of innovation possible.

[10:55] First and foremost is Kubernetes. It's easy to think when we mention WebAssembly that we're somehow not talking about Kubernetes. We are. It's the maturity and the stability of Kubernetes as a platform that allows us to continue innovating in and around it. And for example, the Container D project in the CNCF has many different shims. that allow you to integrate different kinds of workloads into Kubernetes. And Microsoft is very proud of having created the Rust-based Container D project, right, that allows a cold run was the excuse me, and that allows the contributors, along with people like Fermion, Docker, Second State, and many others, can use this project to bring even more flexibility and scaling agility to Kubernetes without affecting the containers you're already using in your clusters right now. And ZEISS is no different than what many, many others are already doing.

[11:56] Now, because it's built on RunWazi, the WebAssembly container DSHIM for spin allows Kubernetes to scale up and down very quickly, as you just saw. but also move your WebAssembly, your workloads from one operating system to another and from one CPU to another on the fly and without multi-arch builds. And because they enable WebAssembly workloads to run in the same pod. As containers, you can continue using your workloads, your container workloads that you use right now. Now finally I want to call out, as I put up here, the operator framework.

[12:30] And KWASM from Liquid Reply, that operator is used to install the SpinShim easily. That's what Kai and Zeiss used without requiring a new cluster. You don't have to bootstrap something new. And there's a community behind all of this work, every single thing we've done. So, most people, though, would really prefer not to search for individual tools. I know a bunch of you are curious to dig into the bits, and you can because they're projects.

[13:02] Right? But most people would like to use a single stack of tools. They don't want to find them all together and then line them up the right way and configure each one. So working with the feedback of Zeiss and others... Fermion, Microsoft, SUSE, and Liquid Reply are proud to announce the creation of SpinCube, which you saw the slide before, which is an open source stack that you can use to streamline the experience of developing, deploying, and operating WebAssembly workloads on Kubernetes along with your container ones. Now, SpinCube includes a runtime class manager, which handles the installation upgrade and uninstallation, of the workloads, the container D shims, like RunWazi-based shims that we're using here.

[13:44] And to run them, we actually have a series of shims. In SpinCube, we're using the RunWazi-based Shims. uh, shim for spin, the spin project. And to optimize those workloads, to do what Zeiss was doing, trying to dial in the density and scaling agility, We use the spin operator. And together, this very full stack of Kubernetes tools allows everyone here and around the world to go ahead and get the very best of their Kubernetes workloads wherever they are. We'd love you to give Spin Cube a try.

[14:16] And the best way to do that is go ahead and snap the QR code. and tell us what you think. Jump into the project repos, give us feedback, and join up and help us make it even better than it already is. Now I want to ask Michelle to come back up here for a second. Thank you. Thank you. And today we'd like to announce that we have submitted the application to contribute SpinCube to the CNCF. Many of us in the cloud native community have been so excited over the last several years about WebAssembly.

[15:00] got lots of people and you got lots of projects working together to make this a more accessible technology in our ecosystem. And we hope that you join us in this endeavor of trying to make the power of WebAssembly even more accessible and leverageable in our space. And if you want to learn more, we'll be at the Microsoft booth as well as the Fermion booth. And we have a talk later today at 2.30 in S3, SO6. Thank you so much.

查看原始字幕

[0:00] So I've recently gotten into boxing. I don't actually box. I mostly just watch from the comfort of my couch. And in boxing, there are weight classes like heavyweight, middleweight, lightweight, and so on. And it's exactly how it sounds. A boxer must meet a certain weight to box within a class. And these weight classes, Remind me of the clouds of the waves of cloud computing.

[0:35] Thank you. So first up, you've got your virtual machines. This is your heavyweight class. Being in the heavyweight class in boxing means you are powerful. But if you get knocked down, it's going to take some time for you to get back up. That's basic physics, right? Virtual machines are the OG heavyweight runtime for the Cloud. Often, they take minutes to start, But they contain an entire operating system from kernel to applications, so you can do a lot with them.

[1:10] A container is lighter and smaller. And in the world of Cloud Computing, this would be your middleweight class. Middleweight strikes a balance between speed and power. containers have given us the perfect environment for running a single long-running server. They take seconds, not minutes, to start, and consume fewer resources than virtual machines. Now, add to that WebAssembly, the third wave of Cloud computing. This is your lightweight class. Speed and agility is the name of the game here. Compile your app once directly to the WebAssembly binary format, and use that same binary across multiple architectures and operating systems with no changes.

[2:01] And a WebAssembly app can be cold started in about half a millisecond. half a millisecond, making it vastly faster than even-- making its startup speed vastly faster than even containers. So how do we run WebAssembly on Kubernetes and in cloud-native environments? I'm going to talk to you about Spin Cube today, which is a project that helps you do just that.

[2:36] So this is a SpinApp custom resource in Kubernetes. Online 6 is a reference to an OCI artifact containing... A WebAssembly binary. Yeah, that's a thing you can do. Behind this SpinApp custom resource lives a spin operator. Once I apply my spin app to my cluster, we're going to see it running in our cluster here.

[3:11] The spin app, the spin operator will actually pick it up and deploy the corresponding deployment pod and service. It's configuring the pod to use a Wasm runtime instead of a container runtime to execute our app. So on the outside, you still have your pods and services, same as usual, but on the inside, they're actually WebAssembly apps, not containers. This is that same app. We're going to increase the replica account to 50, and apply it to our cluster.

[3:43] I'm running on a two node AKS cluster here. And if I check out my pods, they're being distributed, look closely on my two nodes. One is an x86 node and the other is Ampere's ARM64 base node. Thank you. And if I want to scale even further, then I can just throw that same binary on Any burstable incense, that's cheap for me at that time. Thank you. These are the kinds of things that have been important to the team over at Zeiss Group.

[4:18] And I'd like to invite Kai now to talk to us about their experience in this space. Thank you, Kai. Merci, Michel. So coming from size, I can relate to physics. As the ARC in our logo suggests, we handle with spheres, lenses, optics. From microscopes up to this bulk cube like looking clunks of metal, which are high NA lithocatheter systems, which you basically need to produce your beloved Apple silicon or NVIDIA GPUs. These are the only optic devices on the whole planet which can do that.

[4:58] So my R&D experts, they always try to explain this kind of optics to me, but there's no help there, so I can only grasp the basics of it. But what I understand is how to operate such business models on information technology. Many of our business models require that we process the information electronically, be it just for the pure scale of information we have to process or the product specifications which are attached.

[5:34] Oh. So in the beginning, money is not the issue when we start such projects. We The project risks are high, the commitments are made, And we basically recouponated the hell out of that case. Even rubbed some CNCF goodness on it like DAP or KEDA, whatever. As soon as the dust and the business settles, our finance folks catch up with us, which then requires us to basically go into more design for cost approach.

[6:06] Secondly, Often in the beginning, we are capable to have the luxury of designing those services Within bounded contexts, applying domain-driven design So really doing nice systems. Further down the road, often logistic aspects kick in, like container runtime sizes, number of parts limitations, whatever. And soon we are forced to give in basically that the technical granularity of what we run diverges from the semantic granularity. And this is one of the points why we started looking into WebAssembly in the cloud, basically to get those two closer together, the semantic and technical granularity.

[6:58] For that, we generalize one of our many flows, which reflects how we usually do that processing. That means we get a number of messages or orders dropped at our doorstep, and then the expectation is that these messages, they are processed in a given time. answering, okay, when, how we produce or deliver that thing. And this is exactly what we measure. from the arrival of the orders to until they are landing in some buckets.

[7:30] Now let's see that in action. Bye. So what we see here are these three spin apps which had handled the load and their respective deployments. So you see quite regular Kubernetes primitives. Let's generate some load. You see the basic shape of replicas. The load picks up. The first set of replicas already takes in the first chunk of orders. And as soon as the environment is scaling up, the number of orders that can be processed in the same time slice increases dramatically. First, some distributor functions picks the orders, does some basic decisions, and then hands it over over queues to a second wave of services, which basically put it in buckets to some other decisions.

[8:20] What we can see here is how fast the services are scaling up and picking up the traffic. Thank you. In the end, the whole throughput will be around 34 seconds, which if you follow other posts I did with other environments, is pretty darn good. So in the end it's just physics. By using a spin app with WebAssembly artifact instead of a regular deployment, we can for such a Node.js Express app, we can reduce the size from 400 megs to almost 2 megs.

[8:57] So even if we would add more logic, that size will not dramatically increase. And that allows that the... that the scale goes up fast and scales down also as fast, which then on the other hand allows that the same resources with a slight overlap can be reused already by the second or third or fourth wave, whatever wave of processing you have. So we can use the same resources multiple times within such a process.

[9:29] And that's by still applying all the tools, all the environments we already know. Yeah. Again, to conclude, The smaller packaging size allows that we pack more services into the same resources or on the other hand use cheaper resources to process the same posture of services. We can scale up down faster, have a higher grade of reusability of the same resources.

[10:02] while keeping the the the tools we know Here again in numbers, even when switching from just from x86 to ARM, we could reduce with 60%, so we could use 60% cheaper resources for that. And with that, I want to hand over to my brother in hair color, Ralph. Thank you. What you've just seen and heard from Kai is a result of a collection of open source projects in both Go and also Rust and open source foundations, obviously the CNCF and also the Bytecode Alliance Foundation across the entire world in collaboration. And I want to highlight just some of the important projects that you're probably familiar with that actually make this kind of innovation possible.

[10:55] First and foremost is Kubernetes. It's easy to think when we mention WebAssembly that we're somehow not talking about Kubernetes. We are. It's the maturity and the stability of Kubernetes as a platform that allows us to continue innovating in and around it. And for example, the Container D project in the CNCF has many different shims. that allow you to integrate different kinds of workloads into Kubernetes. And Microsoft is very proud of having created the Rust-based Container D project right that allows a cold run was the excuse me and that allows the contributors along with people like Fermion, Docker, Second State, and many others, can use this project to bring even more flexibility and scaling agility to Kubernetes without affecting the containers you're already using in your clusters right now. And ZEISS is no different than what many, many others are already doing.

[11:56] Now, because it's built on RunWazi, the WebAssembly container DSHIM for spin allows Kubernetes to scale up and down very quickly, as you just saw. but also move your WebAssembly, your workloads from one operating system to another and from one CPU to another on the fly and without multi-arch builds. And because they enable WebAssembly workloads to run in the same pod. As containers, you can continue using your workloads, your container workloads that you use right now. Now finally I want to call out, as I put up here, the operator framework.

[12:30] And KWASM from Liquid Reply, that operator is used to install the SpinShim easily. That's what Kai and Zeiss used without requiring a new cluster. You don't have to bootstrap something new. And there's a community behind all of this work, every single thing we've done. So, most people, though, would really prefer not to search for individual tools. I know a bunch of you are curious to dig into the bits, and you can because they're projects.

[13:02] Right? But most people would like to use a single stack of tools. They don't want to find them all together and then line them up the right way and configure each one. So working with the feedback of Zeiss and others... Fermion, Microsoft, SUSE, and Liquid Reply are proud to announce the creation of SpinCube, which you saw the slide before, which is an open source stack that you can use to streamline the experience of developing, deploying, and operating WebAssembly workloads on Kubernetes along with your container ones. Now, SpinCube includes a runtime class manager, which handles the installation upgrade and uninstallation, of the workloads, the container D shims, like RunWazi-based shims that we're using here.

[13:44] And to run them, we actually have a series of shims. In SpinCube, we're using the RunWazi-based Shims. uh, shim for spin, the spin project. And to optimize those workloads, to do what Zeiss was doing, trying to dial in the density and scaling agility, We use the spin operator. And together, this very full stack of Kubernetes tools allows everyone here and around the world to go ahead and get the very best of their Kubernetes workloads wherever they are. We'd love you to give Spin Cube a try.

[14:16] And the best way to do that is go ahead and snap the QR code. and tell us what you think. Jump into the project repos, give us feedback, and join up and help us make it even better than it already is. Now I want to ask Michelle to come back up here for a second. Thank you. Thank you. And today we'd like to announce that we have submitted the application to contribute SpinCube to the CNCF. Many of us in the cloud native community have been so excited over the last several years about WebAssembly.

[15:00] got lots of people and you got lots of projects working together to make this a more accessible technology in our ecosystem. And we hope that you join us in this endeavor of trying to make the power of WebAssembly even more accessible and leverageable in our space. And if you want to learn more, we'll be at the Microsoft booth as well as the Fermion booth. And we have a talk later today at 2.30 in S3, SO6. Thank you so much.

在 Vidleaf 工作台開啟

檢索字幕、選取句子、複製附時間戳的引用,或按需翻譯。

在工作台開啟 →

來源署名

「Keynote Panel Discussion: Revolutionizing Cloud Native Architectures with WebAssembly」由 CNCF [Cloud Native Computing Foundation] 發布,採用 CC BY 3.0 授權。來源影片:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tu8a-GefJL8。此頁呈現影片的文字字幕,由 Vidleaf 加入段落與時間戳。創作者與 Vidleaf 無隸屬或背書關係。頁面若提供 AI 標點、名稱修正或摘要,會分開標示,原始字幕仍可查看。

若你是創作者或權利人,可申請更正或下架: copyright@vidleaf.app (參閱 關於這些頁面)。

最後更新