主题演讲:与 Jo Ann Barefoot(创新监管联盟 &)、Sultan Meghji(FDIC)的炉边谈话
本页标题、字幕、摘要和阅读笔记为已保存的 AI 译文,可能有误。时间戳与来源一致,可展开查看原始字幕,并对照原视频核对。
Jo Ann Barefoot 与 Sultan Meghji 讨论金融监管中的开源、政府中的技术专长以及合作机会。
转录来源:Vidleaf上的自动语音识别(可能包含错误)。AI标点由Vidleaf添加;保留原始措辞和时间戳锚点。原始转录可在下方获取。
AI生成的摘要
两位发言人开场时开玩笑说,监管小组将是上午最无聊的部分,随后论证监管者必须了解业界在用开源做什么,而且他们自己也将不得不使用开源。这位嘉宾被形容为政府中的独角兽,是联邦监管机构中唯一一位真正懂技术的创新负责人;他自 90 年代初起就投身科技行业,背景是 AI 研究员,并且是最早把 Linux 装到 Spark pizza box 上的人之一。他讲述了自己从纽交所和初创公司进入政府的经历;在 FDIC 以及其他机构中,他的角色是充当技术声音,解释正在进行的巨大演变——银行系统正把 20 年的工作压缩到两三年内完成。他提出了自己的梦想(并不代表美联储的立场):立法应当附带开源代码,以代码形式为金融科技公司、科技公司、社区银行和 G-SIFI 提供监管清晰度。他指出了前台和后台的低效、数据标准和 API,以及纽交所创建 FIX 的案例——FIX 在六个月内将交易成本从 $45 降至零,并将吞吐量从 15,000 提升到每节点每秒略高于 400,000 笔交易。他的行动号召有三点,第一点是在监管方面采取主动,尽早且频繁地参与;最后他呼吁保持长期乐观,以更透明、更具包容性的方式建设,由 Air 的 David Eric 和 ING 的 Ian Hallibread 领导的 SIG 已建立 GitHub 供人们加入。
根据文字记录生成。请对照原始视频检查链接段落。
带时间戳的章节摘要
监管者与开源
从科技到 FDIC:政府中的技术声音
- [1:25] 发言人曾在纽交所工作,并在云、生物技术和 AI 领域做过初创公司,还在非洲做过援助工作并在大学任教。
- [1:52] 在卖掉一家公司后,一场与 FDIC 主席 Jelena McWilliams 的小组讨论导致她的幕僚长在大约 15 秒内招募了他。
- [2:05] 他说他们花了两年时间才找到他,而他曾试图帮助安排其他人担任该职位。
- [2:20] 他说很少有人能让他加入美国政府,因为从科技和初创公司转入政府并不是一个自然的转变。
- [3:06] 像中心化到去中心化这样的概念对这里的听众来说很容易,但向一个 1965 年从法学院毕业的人解释可能需要三个小时。
- [3:27] 立法和监管有其位置,但技术必须成为这些讨论的一部分。
- [3:35] 他在 FDIC 以及其他机构中的角色是充当技术声音,解释正在进行的巨大演变。
- [3:45] 银行系统正在追赶数十年的萎缩,把 20 年的工作压缩到两三年内完成。
- [4:01] 他称 FDIC 主席 Jelena McWilliams 是一位真正的有远见的领导者,正在开辟全新的领域。
开源监管的梦想
开源与金融监管
- [6:32] 开源可以帮助解决金融监管问题,首先是需要更好、更动态的客户体验的前台活动。
- [7:02] 后台运营存在荒谬的低效问题。
- [7:08] 每年有数百万人工日被花在 Excel 电子表格之间复制粘贴字段上,制造了风险和摩擦。
- [7:23] 采用数据模型、数据标准、API 和 API 标准将取得巨大成就。
- [7:23] 纽约证券交易所创建 FIX 将交易成本从 $45 降至零,并在六个月内将吞吐量从 15,000 提升至略高于每节点每秒 400,000 笔交易。
- [7:48] 透明度、无摩擦的交易活动和数据标准使监管工作显著更容易,并减轻监管负担。
- [7:57] 开放标准为互操作性铺平道路,并打破供应商锁定,尤其是传统银行技术提供商强加给社区银行的合同结构。
对监管的呼吁
金融科技创新与长期乐观
- [9:36] 未来几年将有惊人的创新涌现。
- [9:36] 不要失去信心,因为这将是一个漫长的过程,介于 Gab 的孩子有孙子孙女和总统政府更迭之间。
- [10:03] 这是进入这个领域的最佳时机。
- [10:05] 在 90 年代,构建第一批信用卡支付基础设施需要手工编写一切,而且 C 编译器在不同平台上无法正确运行。
- [10:05] 现在一屋子人可以在一个半小时内构建出比第一批支付网关好 10 倍的东西。
- [10:35] 有一个绝佳的机会,以更透明、更少摩擦、更包容、更具代表性的方式构建。
- [10:49] 由 Air 的 David Eric 和 ING 的 Ian Hallibread 领导的 SIG 正在努力解决监管问题,并建立了一个 GitHub 供人们加入。
[0:00] - 谢谢。我知道大家总是期待监管小组讨论。- 是的,我的意思是,我们将是整个上午这里最无聊的两个人。所以。我们将不得不把监管者带入这个故事。我在这里。超越你,好吧?所以这就是我们要讨论的。监管者必须理解行业在开源方面正在做什么,而且他们自己也将不得不使用它。你和我都知道,如果让你估计金融监管机构中有多少人甚至能定义开源,你猜百分比是多少?
[0:44] 正如 Gab 所说,在政府中真的是独角兽。你是我们联邦监管机构中唯一一位创新负责人,而且几乎是任何金融监管机构中唯一一位真正是技术人员的。你想花点时间,我知道你已经认识这里的很多人,你想花一分钟谈谈你的背景吗?当然,因为我喜欢谈论自己。是的,所以我从 90 年代初就进入科技行业。我可以追溯到第一个网络浏览器。我背景是人工智能研究员。我是最早在 Spark pizza box 上安装 Linux 的人之一,如果这严重暴露了我的年龄,我相信确实如此。
[1:25] 在几十年里,我曾在纽约证券交易所。我在云、生物技术、人工智能领域做过几家初创公司。去年,我的职业生涯出现了有趣的变化,我会进入一个行业,然后离开去做非营利工作或做有趣的事情。所以我在非洲做过援助工作。我是大学教授和其他一些事情。但去年发生的事情真的很有趣。我当时刚卖掉一家公司,就坐在那里想我可以拿 2021 然后坐享其成。基本上,碰巧和 FDIC 现任主席 Yelena McWilliams 在同一个小组讨论。那次对话结束后大约 15 秒内,她的幕僚长开始疯狂给我打电话,就像,你知道,你能——你知道他们花了两年时间找到你?是的,而且我实际上试图帮助他们让其他人担任这个职位。事实上,我认为可能我试图让担任那个职位的人之一现在就坐在这里。我不会点名,但确实如此。
[2:20] 基本上,很少有人能让我加入美国政府。从科技、从初创公司进入美国政府不是自然的过渡。一年前我还有像 Antoine 一样的头发。模型,这就是许多人,尤其是我接触的成千上万律师,思考技术的方式,我们必须以不同的方式谈论事情。所以早些时候我们听到人们谈论从中心化到去中心化,对吧?这是一个很好的逻辑。这里每个人都懂。
[3:06] 向一个 1965 年从法学院毕业的人解释这一点可能需要三个小时。我曾有美国政府的高级成员问我,为什么我们不能用第 230 条消除暗网?为什么我们不能通过立法摆脱这些讨论?归根结底,立法有一席之地,监管有一席之地,但技术必须成为这些讨论的一部分。所以我现在在美国政府 FDIC 和其他机构中的角色,真的只是作为一个技术声音。
[3:40] 这可以解释正在发生的大量演变。我的意思是,银行系统在某些方面正在追赶数十年的萎缩。变成更有意义的东西。但是。这是20年的工作压缩在两三年内完成。是的。因此,为了实现这一点,必须发生很多变化。对于那些不了解的人,FDIC的主席埃莉诺·麦克威廉姆斯在这方面是一位真正的有远见的领导者。她确实在开辟全新的领域。所以您和我们在AIR和Finnoz一起正在讨论如何推进这一战略。如果一切如您所愿,把时间范围放到五年、十年,或者您想选的任何时间,金融监管界及其在行业中风险管理界的镜像会是什么样子?会发生什么?好吧,我要先说这是我的梦想,而且只是我一个人的梦想。如果你曾经和任何人谈过。好吧,好吧,我必须。我即将做每个美联储的人都会做的事,在公开讲话或甚至在大多数会议上,他们都会先说,我代表我自己发言。我不是美联储的代表。所以我要说这是我的梦想。
[4:56] 我希望当我们通过立法时,附带有开源代码。我希望每一个。给你们举个例子。谢谢。我很高兴听到掌声。但就像我在一次与我经常打交道的一位非常资深人士的会议上说的那样,然后我花了一个小时解释那到底是什么意思。所以我希望我们能达到一个点,我们说,好的,有监管明确性。并且这在代码中得到体现。
[5:27] 然后任何人,无论你是金融科技公司、科技公司、社区银行还是G-CIFI之一,我总是忘记那个缩写。对那里有什么有清晰具体的理解,那么每个人都可以稍微拉平竞争环境。你知道,我一直进出开源。我的意思是,在新时代之前。我的意思是,这就是我一直做这件事的方式。我得说,当你引入标准,当你引入透明度,你不仅加速创新,还使其更易获得。这刺激经济。它刺激了让更多人参与的机会。我们今天早上已经谈到了多样性,听到这个让我非常高兴。但我们能做到所有这些事情。而且系统中存在巨大风险。
[6:14] 我们必须做的事情之一就是提前几年应对。你知道,NIST正在做一些很棒的工作。DHS有一个伟大的量子战略,但如果我们不提前应对,金融系统将面临一些巨大风险。是的。所以这个观众知道开源的好处,但把监管视角放在上面,谈谈,给我们列出如果我们将开源适当地引入金融监管,我们可以解决的问题清单。我的意思是,是的,我的意思是,那个计时器看起来我们时间不多了。是的,是的,是的。你知道,我真的分解金融系统。你有前台活动,我们真的需要做更多来获得更好的客户体验,更多,你知道,更动态的客户体验版本。所以如果有人想和某人坐在办公室里交谈,他们可以这样做。
[7:02] 那以及之间的一切。然后我的后台,有如此荒谬的低效率。你知道,每年有数百万、数百万、数百万的人天被花在将字段从Excel电子表格复制粘贴到其他Excel电子表格上。这其中有风险,有摩擦,你知道,如果我们只是掌握了数据模型和数据标准以及API和API标准,我们会做大量的事情。我讲述在纽约证券交易所创建FIX和交易所系统的故事,因为我参与了其中,以及它所带来的影响。我们从每笔交易45美元降到现在的零。我们在六个月内从每个节点每秒15,000笔交易增加到略高于400,000笔。所以想象一下,如果你能创造那种透明度和无摩擦的交易活动以及数据标准。
[7:48] 突然之间,监管工作变得容易得多。监管负担下降,无论是对我们试图运营一个机构而言,还是对我们必须互动的人而言。你为这些系统的互操作性铺设轨道,你打破了供应商俘获的情况,这强大得令人难以置信。如果你曾经想看看我们拥有的一个非常糟糕的情况,看看一些传统银行技术提供商以及他们与银行,特别是社区银行签订的合同结构,这很荒谬。谢谢。另一个是让技术人才参与这项工作,这对政府来说太难了。简直难以置信。好的,我们只剩下一个半小时了。那么你对这个社区的行动呼吁是什么?这些是能帮助解决这个问题的人。再次,所有的梦想。我自己也是一名前银行监管者。我曾是货币监理署副署长。这里的人们所有的梦想。
[8:40] 用这些开源工具来变革金融,如果我们解决不了监管这一半的方程式,就会撞上监管问题的墙。所以现在你还剩一分钟。是的,我没有,我想说,如果我要请在座的每一位做三件事——我总是喜欢说三件事,因为通常你要么能记住它们,要么就会忘掉第三件,对吧?那么第一件事就是,你知道,在监管方面要主动。如果你所处的领域哪怕只是与之相邻,你知道,就要特意去接触;或者如果你要与任何联邦机构打交道,你可以联系我,我能帮你找到对的人,因为我们在这方面并不总是最直截了当的。所以第一就是参与。尽早且频繁地参与。我总是,你知道,我之前经营过一家公司,我谈到过要“监管前瞻”,你知道,要走在讨论的前面。许多机构在这方面已经变得非常聪明。所以比如我们度过未来几年,我们就会说,好吧,太好了。我们可以开始理清其中一些事情了。我得告诉你, pipeline 里有一些了不起的创新。我对此非常兴奋。所以第二件事是不要对此失去信心。这将是一场漫长的跋涉。我不知道这是否意味着,你知道,等到 Gab 的孩子,你知道,给他生孙子孙女的时候。我不确定我们是否一定是那个时间线,但我们,你知道,它介于那个和总统任期之间。我们大致在那个区间里。我不太确定具体在哪里。然后第三件事是,
[10:03] 这是有史以来最好的时机。身处这个领域。我回想起我们在 90 年代构建一些最早的信用卡支付基础设施的时候,我们不得不手工编写每一件事。我们甚至无法让 C 编译器在不同平台上正确协同工作。我是 Alteryx 的粉丝,我的一个朋友是 Sun OS 的人,而我们让代码在两个平台之间切换所花的时间更多。现在,我大概可以,我们所有人都可以坐在一个房间里一个半小时,构建出比后来成为第一批支付网关的东西好 10 倍的东西。所以你正处在一个驱动市场的绝佳位置,你正处在一个绝佳的机会中,可以以一种非常不同的方式来真正构建它——更透明、摩擦更少、更具包容性,并且更能代表外面的人们。
[10:49] 让我说一下,我们有一个 SIG。由 air 的 David Eric 领导,他就在这里的某个地方,还有 ING 的 Ian Hallibread,我们正在努力解决监管问题,并为此建立了一个 GitHub。所以加入进来吧。我们真的需要每一个人。是的,有可能你会听到我试图在 GitHub 里解释银行系统的某些部分。这就对了。大家一起和我感谢 Sultan。谢谢。谢谢你,John。
查看英文原始字幕
[0:00] - Thank you. I know everyone always looks forward to the regulatory panel. - Yeah, I mean, we are going to be the most boring two people up here all morning. So. We're going to have to bring the regulators into this story. I'm here. Beyond you, all right? So that's what we're going to talk about. The regulators have to understand what the industry is doing with open source, and they're going to have to use it themselves. And you and I know that that conversation, if you were going to estimate the percentage of people in financial regulatory agencies that even could define open source, what percentage would you guess?
[0:44] As Gab said, a unicorn really in the government. You're the only head of innovation at any of our federal regulatory agencies and really almost any financial regulatory agency who's actually a tech guy. Do you want to take a moment to, I know you know a lot of people here already, do you want to just take a minute to talk a little bit about your background? Sure, because I love talking about myself. Yeah, so I've been in tech since the early 90s. I go back to the first web browser. I'm an artificial intelligence researcher by background. I was one of the first guys to put Linux on a Spark pizza box, if that dates me horribly, which I'm sure it does.
[1:25] Over the course of a few decades, I was at New York Stock Exchange. I've done a couple of startups in cloud, biotech, AI. And last year, I've had this interesting bounce in my career where I'll go into an industry and I'll go off and go do something nonprofit or do something fun. So I've done aid work in Africa. I'm a college professor and some other stuff. But what happened last year was really interesting. I was I just sold a company and I was just kind of sitting there thinking I could take 2021 and sit on it. basically and happened to be on a panel with the current chair of the FDIC, Yelena McWilliams. And within about 15 seconds of that conversation ending, her chief of staff started blowing up my phone and it's like, you know, Can you you know they took two years to find you? Yeah, and and and I actually tried to help them put other people in this job. In fact, I think it's possible one of the people that I was trying to get in that job is sitting here right now. I'm not going to call him out for anything, but it's it was.
[2:20] Basically, there are very few people who could get me to join the US government. Going from tech, going from startups into the US government is not a natural transition. I had hair just like Antoine like a year ago. model, which is how so many people, especially the thousands of lawyers I interact with, think about technology, that we have to talk about things in different ways. So earlier we heard people talk about moving from centralized to decentralized, right? That's a great piece of logic. Everybody here gets it.
[3:06] That can take three hours to explain to someone who got out of law school in 1965. I've had senior members of the US government ask me, why can't we get rid of the dark web with Section 230? Why can't we just legislate our way out of these discussions? And at the end of the day, legislation has a place, regulation has a place, but tech has to be part of those discussions. And so my role, in the US government right now at FDIC and across the other agencies, is really just to be a technical voice.
[3:40] that can explain the massive amount of evolution that's been going on. I mean, the banking system is catching up on decades of atrophy in some ways. into something that's going to be much more meaningful. But. it's 20 years of work in two or three years. Yeah. And so there's a lot of change that has to happen to make that work. For those who don't know, the chairman of the FDIC, Eleanor McWilliams, is a real visionary leader in this. She's really plowing whole new ground. So you and we at AIR and Finnoz together are talking about how to go about this strategy. If everything went as you would hope, and put the time horizon out five years, ten years, whatever you want to pick, how would the financial regulatory community and its mirror image in the risk management community in the industry What would it look like? What would be happening? Well, I'm going to preface this by saying this is my dream and my dream alone. And if you've ever talked to anyone. Well, well, I have to. I'm about to do the thing that everybody from the Federal Reserve does, where before they speak publicly or even in most meetings, they preface it by saying, I'm speaking for myself. I'm not a representative of the Federal Reserve. So I will say this is my dream.
[4:56] I would love it if when we pass legislation, there's open source code attached to it. I would love it if every. I to give you guys an example. Thank you. I'm very happy for the applause. But like I said this in a meeting with a very senior person that I deal with often and then it took me an hour to explain what that actually meant. And so I would love it if we got to a point where we say, OK, there's regulatory clarity. and that that's represented in code.
[5:27] And that then anybody, whether you're a fintech or a tech company or a community bank or one of the G-CIFI's, whatever, I always forget that acronym. has a clear and concrete understanding of what's there, then everybody can level out the playing field a little bit. You know, I've been in and out of open source. I mean, pre-new. I mean, that's how I've been doing this. And I got to say that when you bring in standards, when you bring in transparency, not only do you accelerate innovation, you make it more accessible. And that juices the economy. It juices the opportunity of getting more people in. We've talked about diversity already this morning, which makes me incredibly happy to hear that. But we get to do all those things. And we have tremendous risks in the system.
[6:14] of the things we have to do to get in front of that a few years off. You know, NIST is doing some great work. DHS has a great quantum strategy, but like there's some huge risk to the financial system if we don't get in front of this. Yeah. So this audience knows the benefits of open source, but putting the regulatory lens on it, Talk about, give us the list of the problems that we could solve with financial regulation if we brought, appropriately brought open source into it. I mean, yeah, I mean, that timer does not look like we've got a lot of time. Yeah, yeah, yeah. You know, I really break out the financial system. You've got front office activities, which we really need to do more to get better CX in, more, you know, more dynamic versions of CX. So if somebody wants to go sit in an office with somebody and have a conversation, they can do that.
[7:02] that and everything in between. And then my back office, there's just such ridiculous inefficiencies. you know, millions and millions and millions of people days a year are spent copying and pasting fields from Excel spreadsheets into other Excel spreadsheets. And there's risk in that there's friction in that, you know, if we just got our hands on data models and standards around data and. APIs and API standards, we would do a tremendous amount. I tell the story of the creation of FIX at NYSE and the exchange systems because I was part of that as just what it did. We went from $45 a trade to now zero. We went from 15,000 transactions per second per node to just north of 400,000 in six months by going through that. So just imagine if you can create that kind of transparency and frictionless transactional activity and data standards.
[7:48] All of a sudden, the regulatory job becomes significantly easier. Regulatory burden goes down, both in terms of us trying to run a shop, but then also the people we have to interact with. And you lay the tracks for interoperability of these systems, you break out of the vendor capture situation, which is unbelievably powerful. If you ever want to look at a really terrible situation we have is look at some of the legacy banking technology providers and some of the contract structures they put in place on banks, especially community banks, it's ridiculous. Thank you. And another one is to get tech talent in to into the work, which is so hard for the government to do. It's just unbelievable. OK, we've only got a minute and a half left. So what's your call to action for this community? These are the people who can help solve this. And again, all the dreams. I'm a former bank regulator myself. I was deputy controller of the currency. All the dreams that the people here have.
[8:40] for transforming finance with these open source tools are going to butt into a wall with regulatory problems if we can't solve the regulator half of the equation. So now you got a minute left. Yeah, I don't, I would say if I were to ask everybody here to do three things, so I'm all about three things because it's usually you can remember them or you can forget the third one, right? So the first is, you know, be proactive on the regulatory front. If you're operating in space that's even adjacent, you know, make a point of reaching out or if you're dealing with any of the federal agencies, you can connect with me and I can find you the right person because we're not always the most straightforward about that. So one is engage. Engage early and often. I always, you know, previously I ran a company, I talked about being regulatory forward, you know, get in front of that discussion. A number of institutions have gotten very smart about doing that. So like we get over the next few years and we're like, okay, great. We can start to get our head around some of these things. And I gotta tell you, there's some amazing innovation in the pipeline. I'm just so excited about it. So the second thing is don't lose faith on this. This is gonna be a long haul. I don't know if it means, you know, when Gab's kids are, you know, giving him grandkids. I don't know if we're at that timeline necessarily, but we're, you know, it's somewhere between that and presidential administrations. We're somewhere in that band. I'm not really sure where. And then the third thing is,
[10:03] This is the best time ever. to be in this space. I think back on like when we were building some of the first credit card payments infrastructures in the 90s and we were having to hand code every single thing. We couldn't even get C compilers to play correctly together on different platforms. I was a fan of Alteryx, a friend of mine was a Sun OS guy, and it took more time to get our code to change going between the two platforms. Now I can probably, all of us can sit in a room for an hour and a half and build something 10 times better than what became the first payments gateways. So you are in an amazing to drive the market and you're in an amazing opportunity to really build it in a very different way that's more transparent less friction, more inclusive, and more representative of the people out there.
[10:49] And let me just say, we have a SIG. Led by David Eric of air who's here somewhere and Ian Hallibread of ING and we're trying to solve regulatory problems and have a GitHub. set up for this, so join in. We really need everyone. Yeah, it's possible you'll hear me trying to explain parts of the banking system in the GitHub. There we go. Everyone join me in thanking Sultan. Thank you. Thank you, John.
在Vidleaf工作台中打开
搜索转录文本,选择行,复制带时间戳的引文,翻译。
署名
"主题演讲:与 Jo Ann Barefoot、Alliance for Innovative Reg & Sultan Meghji、FDIC 的炉边谈话" 由 The Linux Foundation(https://www.youtube.com/@linuxfoundationorg)制作,根据 CC BY 3.0(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)许可。源视频:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I32B8Y5xTU8。本页是视频的文本转录,添加了段落分隔和时间戳;创作者与 Vidleaf 无关联,也不为其背书。Vidleaf 添加了 AI 标点和 AI 生成的摘要;原始措辞仍可在本页查看。
您是创作者或权利持有人吗?请求更正或移除:copyright@vidleaf.app(参见关于这些页面)。
最后更新于