口述历史(2)_让学生准备进行口述历史访谈
本页标题、字幕、摘要和阅读笔记为已保存的 AI 译文,可能有误。时间戳与来源一致,可展开查看原始字幕,并对照原视频核对。
通过听力练习、角色扮演、开放式问题和尊重的追问,为学生进行口述历史访谈做好准备。
转录来源:Vidleaf 上的自动语音识别(可能包含错误)。AI 标点由 Vidleaf 添加;阅读文本已应用经审核的姓名更正;时间戳锚点保留。原始转录可在下方查看。
AI生成的摘要
这是与 Bridget Martin 录制的三场网络研讨会中的第二场。Bridget Martin 是 Historiana 教学团队的一员,也是一位历史教师,曾与 EuroClio 合作过多个项目,包括口述历史。第一场会议涵盖了在与学生使用口述历史之前需要考虑的事项,本场会议在此基础上重点讨论如何让学生准备好自己进行口述历史访谈,并提供实用建议来培养他们的访谈技能。建议的策略包括:让学生分析名人访谈视频以及来自大英图书馆和哥伦比亚口述历史中心等来源的真实口述历史访谈;使用角色扮演来教授深度倾听,并表演出访谈中不该做的事;进行小型练习访谈并给予反馈,这样学生的第一次真实访谈就不会是他们第一次访谈经历。会议还涵盖如何撰写高质量的、以学生研究为依据的口述历史问题,倾向于开放式而非封闭式问题,避免引导性问题,提交问题清单草稿以标记敏感领域,并准备几个关键问题,同时留有添加、删除或更改的余地。会议结束时,学生已具备进行口述历史访谈的条件。本片段是关于课堂口述历史迷你系列的最后一集,重点讨论学生在完成访谈后如何分析访谈,演讲者感谢 Brigitte 分享她关于为学生准备口述历史访谈的想法。
根据转录生成。请对照原始视频核查所链接的段落。由 Vidleaf 于 2026-10-20 审核。
带时间戳的章节摘要
为学生准备口述历史
为学生准备口述历史访谈
用名人和口述历史片段教授访谈
- [1:55] 一位七年级教师(学生大约 12 岁)从非口述历史访谈开始,使用熟悉的名人访谈来更广泛地介绍访谈。
- [2:25] 该活动使用同一位名人在非常不同的语境中讨论同一个大致话题,例如严肃的一对一新闻访谈和匆忙的红毯访谈,以便学生进行比较。
- [3:00] 观看两段访谈后,学生讨论访谈者的方式有何不同,哪一种更有效以及为什么。
- [3:00] 学生注意到提问数量、提问速度、留给回答的时间以及氛围(嘈杂或平静)方面的差异。
- [3:34] 教师建议随后使用真实的口述历史访谈,例如来自大英图书馆和哥伦比亚口述历史中心的例子,以展示专业口述历史学家如何进行访谈。
- [4:08] 学生可以比较不同访谈者的访谈,观察不同的策略和技巧,以及什么使访谈更好或更差。
角色扮演和访谈练习
通过角色扮演教授深度倾听
- [5:03] 深度倾听意味着感知受访者所说的话与其说话方式之间的脱节,这源自与 Judith Pereira 共同编写的指南。
- [5:26] 在日常对话中,词语并不总是与含义相符,比如讽刺或隐藏的情绪,因此面部表情、语气或姿势可能传达出与单纯词语不同的含义。
- [5:36] 该活动旨在帮助学生实现深度倾听,识别这些脱节,并解读它们的含义。
- [6:06] 有些学生可能会觉得这项任务非常有挑战性,因此教师应对合理的期望做出判断,或考虑替代活动,不过向所有学生教授这些技能仍然很重要。
- [6:21] 在角色扮演中,教师扮演受访者,并有意加入一些表现出言语与所传达含义之间脱节的回应,例如一句讽刺的评论。
- [6:51] 脱节也可能表现出悲伤,比如低垂着眼睛、用悲伤的语气说那是美好的一天,教师可以根据学生年龄或多或少地夸张表现。
- [7:03] 然后学生应识别出脱节的时刻,并讨论它们可能意味着什么。
- [7:16] 学生还应讨论采访者应如何回应,要有同理心,不要强迫人们讨论不舒服的事情,并明确提供休息、停止或改变方向的选择。
- [7:54] 如果某人暗示了另一层含义,采访者可以提出更多问题,以更多地了解他们所暗示的内容。
采访角色扮演与同伴反馈
- [8:19] 角色扮演采访中不该做的事情是一项受学生欢迎的活动。
- [8:27] 两名学生志愿者分别扮演受访者和采访者,就一个可能棘手的话题达成一致,比如五岁时的假期。
- [8:59] 要表演出来的错误包括打断、一次提出多个问题以及提出诱导性问题。
- [9:06] 根据学生年龄,教师可能需要与他们一起研讨如何表现出这个错误。
- [9:20] 全班表演完采访后,小组讨论问题是什么、为什么是问题、它对采访流程或融洽关系的影响,以及如何避免。
- [9:47] 如果时间允许,随后在课堂上进行一次真正的迷你采访,并定期进行反思和反馈环节。
- [9:55] 如果这不可行,学生可以在家里与家人或朋友练习,获得反馈,并一起分享反思。
- [10:16] 在五分钟的练习中,学生 A 采访学生 B,B 给出诚实但建设性的反馈,然后学生互换,并进行全班反思。
学生采访练习策略
撰写高质量的口述历史问题
- [12:32] 问题应以学生对历史主题和受访者的研究为基础,使其有针对性且相关。
- [13:02] 学生应提出开放式而非封闭式问题,不过偶尔可能需要几个封闭式问题来获取背景细节。
- [13:33] 在口述历史采访中,采访者几乎不应说话,主要引导讨论。
- [14:11] 学生应避免暗示答案的诱导性问题,因为这些通常也是封闭式问题。
- [15:05] 学生需要对敏感问题保持谨慎,教师应让他们先提交问题清单草稿,以标记敏感领域。
- [15:38] 受访者可能愿意也可能不愿意讨论敏感问题,因此学生应允许他们暂停、停止或改变方向。
- [16:09] 学生不应写太多问题,因为系统地处理一长串问题会失去对话和开放性。
- [16:33] 学生应准备几个关键问题,并准备好添加、删除或更改问题,包括重要的后续问题。
第二个视频总结与后续步骤
[0:00] - 是的。大家好,欢迎回到我们关于在历史教育中使用口述历史的系列视频录像。这是我们与Bridget一起录制的三场会议中的第二场。我们的会议是“课堂之外的历史”网络研讨会系列的一部分,今天作为讲者与我们在一起的是Bridget Martin,她是Historiana教学团队的一员,同时也是一名历史教师,并一直在EuroClio与我们合作多个项目,包括口述历史。在第一场会议中,我们谈到了在与学生一起使用口述历史之前需要考虑的事项,现在Bridget将告诉我们更多关于如何让学生做好准备的内容。那么Bridget,交给你了。
[0:44] 谢谢。好的。我们现在在第二部分。我想特别关注让学生做好准备,自己进行口述历史访谈。我假设在教学和学习过程的这个阶段,教师已经向学生介绍了口述历史的概念,他们对其是什么、它如何特殊和具体,以及口述历史作为一个研究领域的一些关键特征有了大致了解。现在我们要真正进入如何为学生培养这些访谈技能的实践层面。所以我希望在这一部分给你们很多非常实用的想法。
[1:26] 我认为第一个非常有用的策略,是在学生自己扮演访谈者进行角色扮演或练习访谈之前,实际上先让他们观看其他访谈者,我发现最好的方法是使用不同访谈的视频并进行分析,观察不同的访谈技巧、策略等如何影响访谈的展开以及我们听到的叙述和故事。所以这是我与七年级学生一起使用的一个例子或活动。我们说的是12岁的学生,差不多。实际上我从并非口述历史的访谈开始,我看了目的完全不同的访谈,只是为了更广泛地引入访谈这个概念,并从学生可能更熟悉的东西开始,当然就是名人访谈。
[2:25] 女权主义,但你可以选择用任何名人来做这件事。想法是找到一个人,同一个人,在非常不同的情境中大致谈论同一个话题,这样你就可以比较不同的访谈等等。所以在这个案例中,我想我只是在YouTube上找到了一个非常严肃的新闻访谈,一对一,背景是非常空白的黑色,另一个是在红毯上,非常兴奋,很匆忙,以及所有那些类型的……访谈本身有不同的风格和目的,但总体话题是不同的。
[3:00] 所以我们观看了这两个访谈,然后我让学生讨论这些问题。他们进行访谈的方式有什么不同?你认为哪一个更有效,为什么?学生们指出了很多不同的方面,比如问了多少个问题、问得有多快、留给她多少时间回答、关于氛围,是嘈杂还是平静,以及所有那些类型的事情。访谈。所以这可以只是一个有趣且容易接触的起点。
[3:34] 然后你可以做的是,给他们看一些真实的口述历史访谈,让他们对专业口述历史学家如何进行访谈有个大致了解。现在,我在这里放了两个在线档案的例子。一个来自大英图书馆。一个来自哥伦比亚口述历史中心。但网上有堆积如山的口述历史档案,来自不同国家,涉及不同主题。可能与你的学生相关的访谈片段。
[4:08] 你可以做同样的事情,看看几个不同的访谈,特别是由不同采访者进行的访谈,看看学生能观察到不同的策略、技巧和访谈的各个方面,什么使访谈更好或更差以及为什么,等等。所以这可能是一个非常好的起点。从这里开始,我们可以进入一些有趣的角色扮演和练习访谈活动。我确实认为这非常重要,因为我们要确保学生第一次真正出去与家庭成员或社区成员或任何人进行访谈时,不是他们第一次采访别人的经历。我们要确保我们已经在课堂上尽可能多地培养了这些技能,这样当他们去进行真正的访谈时,他们真的准备好做好工作。
[5:03] 所以,我们应该鼓励学生练习的一个方面是深度倾听,我实际上是从我们与朱迪思·佩雷拉和我自己一起制作的指南中摘录的,这里写着深度倾听意味着学生能够感知和理解受访者所说的话与他们的说话方式之间存在脱节。这与这样一个想法相关:即使在日常对话中,我们说的话并不总是与我们的意思相符,以及我们是否在。
[5:36] 也许是讽刺,或者试图隐藏一种情绪,或者各种不同的原因,可能使我们的面部表情、语气或姿势传达出与我们所说话语本身非常不同的含义。所以这个活动试图帮助学生实现深度倾听,识别这些脱节,并尝试解释它们的含义。我认为这里可能重要的是要承认,可能会发现这类任务真的很有挑战性。而你作为老师,可能只需要运用你的判断力来决定对这些学生来说什么是合理的期望,或者也许是一个替代活动。但除此之外,我认为我们正在教所有学生这类技能,这很重要。
[6:21] 所以在这个例子中,你作为老师可以扮演受访者的角色,你让学生就任何商定的主题采访你。然后你可以在你的回答中故意包含一些回应,显示你所说的话与你的声音和语言所传达的含义之间的脱节。所以这可能是一个讽刺的评论。是的,这是一个非常棒的工作场所。它可能以某种方式表现出悲伤,那是美好的一天,但例如眼神低落、语气悲伤。而且你可能根据学生的年龄,或多或少地夸张一些。
[7:03] 但希望学生们能够识别出那些言语与说话方式之间存在脱节的时刻。然后讨论一下,那可能意味着什么?我们能从这种脱节中理解什么?还要讨论他们作为采访者应该如何应对这类情况。所以如果我作为受访者表现出对某件事相当不舒服或不安,我们需要与学生讨论,或者你应该如何回应?我们如何确保我们富有同理心,不强迫人们讨论他们不愿意讨论的事情,我们明确给他们机会休息或停止访谈或转向不同的方向等等。那么我们如何利用这个人,或者如果这不是特别负面的事情,但有人暗示了其他事情或另一个真相或另一个含义,也许这是你作为采访者提问的机会。
[8:07] 更多问题,以更多地了解他们可能暗示的内容。所以围绕这种互动可以进行大量的讨论。所以这是一种角色扮演活动。另一种我非常喜欢并且学生真的很喜欢的活动是角色扮演访谈中不该做什么。所以在这种情况下,我会请两名学生自愿参加。一个将是受访者,我们会与他们商定主题,也许是他们五岁时的假期,或者可能有点困难但类似的事情。
[8:57] 那可能是类似的事情。打断他们正在采访的人,一次问多个问题,问引导性问题。等等。有时,同样根据学生的年龄,你可能需要与他们稍微研讨一下,他们如何在这个场景中展示那个错误。他们进来。他们在全班面前表演访谈。然后我们作为一个小组讨论,问题是什么?错误是什么?为什么是个问题?使用角色扮演来观察这个人打断对访谈流程或采访者和受访者之间的关系产生了什么影响,真的很有用。然后我们如何避免它?我们需要确保我们反而做什么?好的,然后我建议做一个真正的回顾。
[9:45]迷你采访。如果你有时间,在教室里进行这个活动,然后加入这些定期的反思和反馈环节,是非常好的。如果由于某种原因这不可行,你也可以让学生在家里自己完成,作为家庭作业,例如,与家人或朋友进行练习,然后从那个人那里获得一些反馈,他们进行反思,你们也可以一起分享。所以基本上,你们会商定一个主题,给学生一个时间限制,也许五分钟。
[10:16]首先,你让A学生采访B学生,B学生会向A学生提供反馈。以下是我认为你做得非常好的地方。当你说这个的时候,我感到有点不舒服,你看起来并没有真正在听我说话,不管是什么,给出那个反馈,并尽量诚实但具有建设性。然后也要求学生自己进行反思。一旦你完成了这些,学生们也交换了角色等等,你就可以进行全班反思,讨论什么是困难的,我们做得好的地方是什么,什么是好的,我们可以改进什么,等等。
[10:49]所以迷你练习采访非常有帮助。我甚至在硕士阶段也做过这个。所以它绝对应该成为那种准备的一个要素。你 我过去发现有用的另一个策略也是练习进行一种全班采访。所以,在学生自己出去进行采访之前,你可以让整个小组准备一次对客座演讲者的采访,你邀请他来与班级交谈。这创造了一个有点安全的空间,学生们可以一起练习,然后他们可以作为一个小组进行反思。
[11:23]你可以稍微引导那个反思,围绕那次采访是如何展开的。这可以是一种很好的、安全的方式,开始与真正的陌生人练习,而不是例如与你的同学练习。然后我建议做的是实际上让学生创建他们自己的提示清单,例如。所以这里我仅作为一个例子,列出了我七年级学生制定的清单。所以再次说明,我们说的是12岁的学生。几年前,我们在做一个关于信仰体系以及这些信仰体系如何影响不同人生活的项目。
[11:59]他们根据我们之前所做的所有工作为自己制定了这份清单。这对他们来说是一件非常有用的事情,可以在进行真实采访之前提醒自己需要注意什么。所以要求学生生成这样一份清单可以非常有帮助。好的,那么一旦我们发展了所有这些技能等等,或者也许与此结合,我们也应该谈论写问题以及如何写高质量的问题等等。所以我有几个。
[12:32]非常简单的提示。当然,我们还可以在这个清单上添加更多,但只是为了保持简单。正如我们在第一个视频中提到的,学生进行关于历史主题以及关于他们正在采访的人的研究非常重要。他们利用这项研究来写出非常有针对性和相关的问题,这将帮助他们回答自己项目的研究问题。我们还会确保他们从那次采访中获得最大的收获。所以它应该始终以研究为依据。你 学生应该始终问开放式而不是封闭式问题。所以封闭式问题是一个会有非常简短答案的问题,比如。
[13:11]1961或者是或否或这类东西,偶尔你可能需要包含几个,只是为了获得一些背景细节,但你绝对想避免出现一长串封闭式问题的场景,因为你不会得到那种对话,而那是我们在口述历史采访中想要的,所以我总是对学生说,基本上在口述历史采访中。采访者几乎不应该说话,他们的角色实际上是确保受访者能够分享他们的经历、记忆和评论。采访者的角色可能只是引导那个讨论,但他们自己应该说得非常少。所以开放式问题是正确的方式。你能告诉我关于,你能描述,为什么,等等。这会邀请受访者给出更广泛和更发展的答案。
[14:10]你 与此同时,学生还需要小心避免引导性问题。所以引导性问题是你在所问的问题中已经暗示了答案的问题。例如,你可能会问,你是因为你的父母而搬离那个村庄的吗?现在你已经暗示了因为你的父母是那个人可能离开的原因。这也是一个封闭式问题,这不太好。所以一个不那么引导性的问题可能更像是,你为什么搬离那个村庄?然后你把所有可能的答案都留给那个人。所以特别是当学生有特定的研究重点时,他们有时会不假思索地问这些引导性问题。所以试图提高他们的意识,确保问题尽可能开放,是非常重要的。
[15:05]学生还需要谨慎对待敏感问题上的提问。所以学生了解哪些问题可能对人们敏感是非常重要的,而且通常,嗯不是通常,但有时他们可能不知道什么敏感或不敏感。所以我总是鼓励你作为老师,要求学生先向你提交一份问题草稿清单,这样你可以也许标记出他们涉及的、可能对受访者敏感的领域。
[15:36],以便他们为此做好准备。有些受访者可能非常愿意谈论敏感问题。也有些受访者可能感到不自在,我们同样需要与学生讨论:如果受访者感到不自在,应允许他们暂停、停止或改变访谈方向;同时还要确保我们在询问敏感话题时保持尊重。所以这只是需要你和学生们注意的一点。
[16:09]另一个关键点是不要写太多问题,尤其是当他们已经做了大量研究的时候。学生们会很兴奋,写出一长串问题。但我们真正想避免的是这样一种情况:访谈变成了问题一、问题二这样一路问下去。他们按部就班地过完这份长长的清单。这样一来,我们又失去了对话、开放性和与对方的关系。所以我建议只准备几个关键问题来引导讨论。然后学生们还需要准备好改变、删除和增加问题,所以他们事先准备的问题到访谈结束时不应该与开始时完全一样,因为这是自然而然的。
[16:53]他们可能需要增加问题,尤其是追问非常重要。您能再多告诉我一些关于X的情况吗,或者关于刚才提到的任何内容。他们可能需要删掉一个问题。这是我经常看到的一个错误,尤其是年纪较小的学生,他们拿着自己的清单,问到了第六个问题,但实际上对方已经讨论过那个话题了。学生们还是照样问那个问题。所以他们需要真正倾听对话,并准备好如果某个问题不再相关或不合适就删掉它,或者如果需要的话稍微改变一下问题。
[17:27]那么这就到了第二个视频的结尾。这应该能让学生们处于一个非常好的位置,去开展精彩的口述历史访谈。在这个迷你系列的下一部分也是最后一部分中,我们将看看他们在完成访谈后如何分析这些访谈。Brigitte,再次非常感谢你与我们分享你关于如何为学生准备口述历史访谈的想法。视频的一部分。
[18:03] *吸鼻子*
查看英文原始字幕
[0:00] - Yeah. Hello everyone and welcome back to our series of video recordings on the use of oral history in history education. This is the second of our three sessions recorded together with Bridget. Our sessions are part of the webinar series on history outside of the classroom and here with us as a speaker we have Bridget Martin who is a member of the History Anna Teaching and Learning team but also a history teacher and has been working with us at Uroclia on several projects including a oral history. In the first session we talked about things to consider before using oral history with your students and now Bridget will tell us more about how to prepare students. So Bridget, the floor is yours.
[0:44] Thank you. Okay. So we are in part two. where I would like to focus specifically on preparing students to conduct oral history interviews themselves. I'm assuming at this point in the teaching and learning process that teachers have introduced the concept of oral history to their students, that they have a general idea about what it is, how it's special and specific, and some of the key features of oral history as a field of study. And now we're really getting into the practicalities of how we can those interview skills for students. So I'm hoping to give you lots of really practical ideas in this section.
[1:26] I think the first strategy that's really useful before we get into students acting as interviewers themselves in role plays or in practice interviews is actually asking them first to watch other interviewers and the best way I find to do this is using videos of different interviews and analyzing those and looking at how different interview techniques and strategies and so on can impact on at the way that the interview unfolds and the narrative and the story that we hear. So this was one example or activity that I use with my grade seven students. So we're talking 12 year old students more or less. Where actually I started with interviews that weren't oral histories, I looked at interviews that had entirely different purposes, just to take the idea of interviewing more broadly and to start with something that's maybe a bit more familiar to the students, which is of course celebrity interviews.
[2:25] feminism, but you could choose to do this with any celebrity. The idea is to find someone, the same person, talking about the same topic in general in very different contexts, and that way you can compare the different interviews and so on. So in this case, I think I found just on YouTube one that was a very serious journalistic interview, one-to-one with a very blank black backdrop and so on, and the other one was on the red carpet, very excited, in a rush, and all those kinds of The interviews themselves had different styles and purposes, but the overall topic was different.
[3:00] So we watched both of those interviews, and then I asked the students to discuss these questions. What was different about the way the interview conducted their interviews? And which one do you think was more effective and why? And the students pointed out lots of different things around how many questions were asked, how quickly they were asked, and how much time was left for her to answer them, about the atmosphere, whether it was noisy or calm, and all of those kinds of things. interviewing. So this can be just kind of a fun accessible starting point.
[3:34] And then what you might do is show them some actual genuine oral history interviews to get a bit of an idea of how professional oral historians conduct their interviews. Now, I've put two examples of online archives here. One is from the British Library. One is from the Columbia Center for Oral History. But there are mountains and mountains of archives of oral histories online from all different countries about all different topics. segments of interviews that might be relevant to your students.
[4:08] And you can do the same thing, have a look at a few different interviews conducted, particularly by different interviewers, and see what the students can observe about the different strategies and techniques and aspects of the interview, what makes a better or worse interview and why, and so on. So this can be a really nice starting point. From here, we can get into some fun sort of role play and practice interview activities. And I do think this is really important because we want to make sure that the first time students are actually going out and conducting their interview with a family member or a member of the community or whoever it may be, is not their first experience of interviewing someone. We want to make sure that we've developed those skills already in the classroom as much as we can, and that then they're really ready to do a good job when they go and conduct their real interviews.
[5:03] So, one aspect that we should be encouraging students to practice is deep listening, and I've actually pulled this from our guide that was made with Judith Pereira and myself, and it's written here deep listening means that students will be able to sense and to understand that there's a disconnect between what the interviewee is saying, and how they're saying it. And this is linked to the idea that even in everyday conversation, the words that we say don't always correspond to our meaning and whether we're.
[5:36] being sarcastic perhaps, or trying to hide an emotion, or all kinds of different reasons, might make it that our facial expressions or our tone or our posture convey a very different meaning than the actual words that we're saying by themselves. And so this activity is trying to help students to be able to achieve that deep listening and identify those disconnects and try to interpret what they mean. I think it's probably important to acknowledge here that may find this type of task really challenging. And you as a teacher probably just need to use your judgment about what is reasonable expectation for those students, or perhaps an alternative activity. But beyond that, I think it is important that we're teaching all students these types of skills.
[6:21] So in this example, you as the teacher could take on the role of the interviewee, and you ask the students to interview you about whatever agreed upon topic. And then you can intentionally include in your responses, responses that show this disconnect between the words that you're saying and the meaning that's conveyed by your voice and language. So it might be a sarcastic comment. Yeah, this is a really wonderful place to work. it might be showing sort of sadness somehow, it was a wonderful day, but with downcast eyes and a sad tone, for example. And you might, depending on the age of your students, you might exaggerate it more or less.
[7:03] But the hope is that the students are then able to identify those moments where there was a disconnect between the words and the way they were said. then have a discussion about, well, what might that mean? What can we understand from that disconnect? And also have a discussion about how they as interviewers should respond to in these kinds of scenarios. So if I perhaps as the interviewee showed that I was quite uncomfortable or upset about something that we need to discuss with the students or how should you respond? How can we make sure that we're being empathetic, that we're not pushing people to discuss things that they are not comfortable with discussing, that we're giving them explicitly an opportunity to take a break or to stop the interview or to go in a different direction and so on. So how can we make of the person, or perhaps if it was not something particularly negative, but someone hinting at something else or another truth or another meaning, maybe that's an opportunity for you as the interviewer to ask.
[8:07] more questions to get a little bit more of an idea of what they might have been hinting at. So there's a huge amount of discussion that can then happen around this kind of interaction. So that's one role play type activity. Another one that I really love and the students really enjoy is a role play of what not to do during an interview. So in this case, I'd ask two students to volunteer. One will be the interviewee and we would agree with them what the topic will be, maybe their holidays when they were five years old or something that might be a little bit difficult but something on those lines.
[8:57] that might be something like. interrupting the person they're interviewing, asking more than one question at a time, asking leading questions. and so on. And sometimes, depending again on the age of the student, you might need to workshop with them a little bit, how they might be able to show that mistake in this scenario. They come in. They act out the interview in front of the class. And then we discuss as a group, what was the problem? What was the mistake? Why was it a problem? And it's really useful to use the role play to see what was the effect that this person interrupting had on the flow of the interview or the relationship between the interviewer and the interviewee, for instance. And then how can we avoid it? What do we need to make sure that we're doing instead? OK, and then I would suggest doing a real review.
[9:45] mini interview. If you have time, it's great to do this in the classroom and then add in these regular reflections and feedback sessions. If for whatever reason that's not feasible, this is also something that you could ask students to do on their own at home for homework, for example, do a practice with a member of their family or a friend, and then get some feedback from that person and they reflect and you can share that together as well. So essentially you'd agree on a topic, you'd give students a limit, maybe five minutes.
[10:16] First, you'd have student A interview student B, and student B would give their feedback to student A. Here's what I think you did really well. I felt a little bit uncomfortable when you said this, you looked like you weren't really listening to me, whatever it is, give that feedback and try to be honest but constructive. And then also ask the student themselves to reflect. And once you've done that and the students have swapped and so on, you can then have a whole class reflection session about what was difficult, what are we doing well, what was good, what could we improve on, and so on.
[10:49] So mini practice interviews are super helpful. I even did this at the master's level. So it definitely should be an element of that preparation. you Another strategy that I have found useful in the past is also to practice doing sort of a whole class interview. So before the students go off and do interviews by themselves, you can ask the whole group to prepare an interview of a guest speaker that you invite to come and talk to the class. And this creates a bit of a safe space and the students can practice together and then they can reflect as a group.
[11:23] And you can guide that reflection a little bit around how that interview unfolded. And this can be a nice sort of safe way to start practicing with real strangers as opposed to your classmates, for instance. And then what I'd recommend doing is actually asking the students to create their own list of tips, for example. So here I've got just as an example, the list that was developed by my grade seven. So again, we're talking 12 year old students. A couple of years ago, we were doing a project about belief systems and how those belief systems had affected different people's lives.
[11:59] And they developed this list for themselves based on all of the previous work that we had done. And this is a really useful thing for them to remind themselves before they do their real interview what they need to pay attention to. So asking the students to then generate a list like this can be really helpful. All right, so once we've developed all of those skills and so on, or perhaps in conjunction with that, we should also be talking about writing questions and how to write quality questions and so on. So I've got a few.
[12:32] Very simple tips. There are of course many more that we could add to this list, but just to keep it simple. As we mentioned in the first video, it's really important that students are conducting research about the historical topic and about the person they're interviewing. And they're using that research to write really targeted and relevant questions that will help them answer their own research question for the project. And we'll also make sure they're getting the most out of that interview. So it should always be informed by research. you Students should always be asking open and not closed questions. So a closed question is one that will have a very short answer like.
[13:11] 1961 or yes or no or these kinds of things occasionally you might need to include a couple just to get some contextual details right but you definitely want to avoid a scenario where you have a big long series of closed questions because you won't get that dialogue which is what we're looking for in an oral history interview so i always say to the students that essentially in an oral history interview. The interviewer should do almost none of the talking, and their role is really to make sure that the interviewee is able to share their experiences and memories and commentary. And it might just be the role of the interviewer to guide that discussion, but they should be doing very little of the talking themselves. So open questions are the way to go. Could you tell me about, can you describe, why did, etc. This will invite much broader and more developed answers from the interviewee.
[14:10] you Along with that, students also need to be careful to avoid leading questions. So a leading question is one in which you've implied the answer, already in the question that you're asking. So for example, you might ask, did you move away from that village because of your parents? Now you've already implied that because of your parents was the reason that the person might have left. It's also a closed question, which is not great. So a less leading question might be something more like, why did you move away from that village? And then you're leaving all possible answers open to the person. So especially when students have particular research focus, they can sometimes ask these leading questions without really thinking about it. So trying to raise their awareness and making sure that questions are as open-ended as possible is really important.
[15:05] Students also need to be cautious of questions on sensitive issues. So it's really important that students are aware of which issues might be sensitive to people and often, well not often, but sometimes they might not be aware of what is or is not sensitive. So I'd always encourage you as the teacher to ask the student to submit a draft question list to you first so that you can perhaps flag any areas that they're going into that could perhaps be sensitive for the interviewee.
[15:36] so that they're prepared for that. It may be that some interviewees are very comfortable to talk about issues that are sensitive. It may be that some interviewees are not comfortable and again we need to have discussions with students around allowing interviewees to pause or stop or change the direction of an interview if they're not comfortable and also making sure that we are respectful in the way that we're asking questions about sensitive things. So this is just something for you and the students to be aware of.
[16:09] Another key is not to write too many questions, especially when they've done a lot of research. Students get very excited and write a big long list. But what we really want to avoid is a situation in which the interview is something like question one, question two, and so on. And they're working through this very long list systematically. And again, we're losing that dialogue and that openness and that relationship with the person. So I would suggest a few key questions that can focus the discussion. And then students also need to be ready to change and remove and add questions so whatever questions they prepare beforehand should not be exactly the same as what they've asked by the end of the interview, because naturally.
[16:53] They might need to add questions, especially follow up questions are really important. Could you tell me a little bit more about X or whatever it was that was mentioned. They might need to remove a question. This is a mistake that I see often, especially with younger students, that they've got their list and they arrive at question six, but actually the person had already discussed that topic. The students still ask the question anyway. So they need to really be listening to the conversation and be ready to remove a question if it's no longer relevant or appropriate, or perhaps change the question a little bit if they need to.
[17:27] So that brings us to the end of the second video. This should get the students in a really great position to be conducting wonderful oral history interviews. And in the next and final part of this mini series, we'll have a look at how they can then analyse those interviews once they've completed them. Thank you, Brigitte, once again, very, very much for sharing with us your thoughts about how to prepare students for oral history interviews. part of the video.
[18:03] *sniff*
在Vidleaf工作台中打开
搜索转录文本,选择行,复制带时间戳的引文,翻译。
署名
“口述历史(2)_为学生准备开展口述历史访谈”,作者为EuroClio欧洲历史教育者协会(https://www.youtube.com/@euroclioeuropeanassociation),依据CC BY 3.0(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)许可。源视频:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PmkwcNgIbgE。本页是该视频的文本转录,增加了段落分隔和时间戳;创作者与Vidleaf无关联,也不为其背书。Vidleaf添加了AI标点和AI生成的摘要;原始措辞仍可在本页查看。阅读文本还包括Vidleaf经来源核实的姓名更正。
您是创作者或权利持有人吗?请求更正或移除:copyright@vidleaf.app(参见关于这些页面)。
最后更新于